Kants Moral Thoery Essay

(1) Explain Kants lesson surmisal. Explain and critique Kants response to The national socialists Objection. Immanuel Kant is one of the most respected and analyse philosopher of all time and is known for his basal yet in-depth virtuous theories and the belief that pietism stems non from divine command or cultural conditioning provided from conclude and human freedom. His straight forward beliefs keep an eye on from his very strict Lutheran upbringing which consisted of cosmopolitan rights and universal wrongs with no exceptionsHe believed his goodistic lawfulnesss to be universal and use to every(prenominal) creation including God, spirits and extraterrestrials. His honourables made him a leading insure in deontology which judges people on their reach mechanisms, not the consequences of their actions, as chastely signifi s as well asget. And actions ar merely as good as their intent to be morally permissible. Kant introduced both commandments of reason, called arrogants, from which all obligations and duties arise.The first clamant is called a hypothetical imperative which Kant describes as, the practical indispensableness of a possible action as core to another end(Kant, p. 327). This means if you want A thus you must do B, such as if you want people to cipher you a thief, so you shouldnt steal. This imperative is helpless upon our wants and goals which ar ultimately rooted in egotism interest. The second imperative, which Kant bases the majority of his moral theory on, is called a categorical imperative which has no if in it and is a concrete universal law.Kant defines this imperative as an action that is objectively necessary in itself without address to any purpose(Kant, p. 327). The categorical imperative of the instance listed above would simply be dont steal, because it against moral law. These imperatives rule out all self interest and argon very coarse to what is right. Kants moral laws are laws that hand to everyone and everyaffair without question. All things that should be through are required by moral law and all things that should not be done are forbidden by moral law.The method of determining these moral laws toilet be derived by what Kant describes as the only real categorical imperative in which he tells people to Act as if the proverb of your action were to become by your will, a universal law of nature(Kant, p. 328). This makes the argumentation of a moral obligation or action a very unanalyzable process. You must simply ask if your action can be made into a universal moral law and if it cannot then you must not do it. And if they resolve is yes, then that means that the action can or should be performed by every being in the universe with no colorise areas or exceptions to the rule.One manikin Kant uses is a man who is seriously grim and debating with the thought of ending his own life. Kant describes his maxim as from self-love I encounter it as a principle to veer my life when its longer duration Is probable to spread more evil than satisfaction(Kant, p. 328). nevertheless though he may think he is doing a good thing for the world out of self-love, a universal law to destroy life could not exist. One major argument against Kants moral theory w here a grey area is obviously present is whether or not it is pass to lie downstairs the right circumstances.The main objection here is called the Nazi objection which asks that if you lived in Nazi Germany during the 1930s and officers were at your door petition if you were harboring any Jews would it then be morally permissible to lie because if you told the truth, the Jews would be killed? fit in to Kants moral theory you must tell the officers where you are hiding them, but after the Nazis go after the Jews, it then becomes your moral obligation to help the Jews from being killed which turns into a huge contradiction(Furman).If we listened to Kant in this situation, the proprietor of the house as well as the Jews would both be murdered and the moral right that you tried to accomplish would be wrong. Therefore, Kants theory is false and it is okay to lie as long as your reason is to preserve a high vocation such as the duty to preserve human life. While Kants moral theory does view a fantastic base for many good issues and moral issues, his theory runs into problems because of its absoluteness.Another example of this is the moral dilemma that would occur if you have made two separate commitments and are somehow only able to touch one of them because of unforeseen circumstances(Furman). Kant leaves no statement on how to deal with this situation because you are breaking a promise when you litigate one but not the other. The origin would be to use your intuition and reasoning and make a decision on the importance of each commitment. So although his theory does provide good rules to live by, it Is too restricted to become fully accepted.